Resultados (
inglés) 3:
[Dupdo]Copiado!
Second, some of those who do vote, whether for the losers or winners.May realise that they will be ruled in any case, regardless of how or whetherThey vote. Consequently, any one of them May reason that by not voting IAssuredly gains nothing by voting while I have a Remote chance of being theSwing Voter. Voting for that reason hardly shows consent. In the same way,Buying a ticket in a Lottery where the prizes are funded by a tax on participantsAnd non participants alike is not likely to be an endorsement of that Lottery. ItIs more likely to be a somewhat pathetic attempt to minimise the loss imposedBy the tax. Here, we see that Hobbesian Democracy cannot even claim to beGovernment by consent of the majority. The number of people who vote onlyBecause they feel pressured to do so may be large. The Swing Voters may beAmong them. That they vote for a particular party does not mean that theyConsent to being ruled by it.
Está traduciendo, por favor espere..
